The “Jack La Lanne” effect
At the beginning of every new year
there always seems to be a heightened volume of emotion regarding
investments…renewed hope, dreams, and expectations. On January 1st all things seem
possible for the year ahead. Any persistent
pessimism or sadness regarding unfulfilled goals are now in the rearview
mirror. And yet, this amplified optimism
is anathema to those of us in the quantitative sciences because we don’t
necessarily live in a world defined by the calendar…more specifically, a twelve
month delineation comprised of 52 weeks.
Rather, trends are defined by us as measurable cycles indifferent to
labels like “January” or “May”. The
denominator in our equations does not mathematically correlate with the change
of seasons, specific holidays, or the turn of a page.
That is why it is particularly vexing
this time of year to hear moderators and talking heads in the media pontificate
about whether or not the markets are already “on track” or “off on
the wrong foot”. To be clear, we hold
no animus towards optimists, nor are we anti-renaissance. But when deciding between science and misplaced
euphoria, particularly in the area of portfolio decision-making, we are
decidedly pro-science.
Let’s just agree that markets are
inexorably linked to myriad global phenomena and that we all wish for
sufficient (investment) outcomes.
The economic data is
incontrovertible: the steepest rate hike cycle in decades is near completion;
consumer spending and inflation are discreetly receding; the post-Covid
spending binge has increased household and corporate debt; unemployment has
declined from a high two years ago of over 6% to nearly 3.7% today; a “soft
landing” is more likely than a full-blown recession; and the rally in stocks
accelerated because traders and speculators fueled a buying spree, worried that
they might miss out on gains if they weren’t “in it”.
We know that monetary campaigns have
insufficiently captured the imagination of the marketplace. Issues like mortgage affordability have
dampened enthusiasm in the real estate market.
Policy and people are at odds over whether these monetary
strategies are getting the job done in a way that serves the need of the
consumers . We have a moral dilemma
in the midst of a practical problem
about how money is appropriated for
kitchen table economics. The wealth gap
favors those who already have the money.
When policy is seen as the impediment to a solution, market trends
quickly devolve and the public loses its altruistic enthusiasm.
Because investors become infatuated
about believing that January 1st represents some kind of spiritual annual
rebirth of opportunity and optimism, many are losing focus from the underlying
secular trendlines. It’s kind of like
signing up for a gym membership every January, ever optimistic and hopeful that
this is the year of our ultimate success……until our attention and commitment is
diverted elsewhere!
Cycles….not hyperbole
As part of this secular macro “bigger
picture” it is more important to recognize that at any date (or data) is a snapshot,
a part of a longer continuum in an adventure to get from here to there. The terms magnitude and duration represent a quantifiable plethora of possible
outcomes. While sentiment is valuable,
statistics and stochastic integers are more conclusive in the exercise to
determine efficient portfolio allocations.
Our models are showing a distinct
shift in sector weightings this year.
Consumer discretionary equities are particularly vulnerable to pricing
pressure and diminishing demand. Higher
core costs (commodities) are affecting earnings and supply chains
(inventories). Filling the gas tank is
an onerous proposition for many families.
The recent modest decline in inflation takes a long time to unwind
completely, measured in years not days or weeks. We still see emerging
opportunity in sustainable socially responsible themes (agriculture, energy,
infrastructure).
The bottom line this week, and going
forward, is to find and invest in earnings and accelerating trends. The economy is healthy enough (in spite of
shortcomings and inefficiencies) to sustain innovation, morality, and profits
at the same time. We anticipate
breakouts, not breakdowns, from our portfolios in the coming weeks.
No comments:
Post a Comment