Pave
Paradise
A
unique confluence of factors is emerging as Wall Street appears to be ending
one of its most durable rallies in recent memory: businesses and politicians
are unwittingly conspiring to reengineer the process by which “success” is measured
for themselves and the “average” investor.
While no one who owns stocks had been complaining during the massive
run-up in valuations, there are enough concerns now about how wealth is
staggered throughout the economy, and just who, really, is the beneficiary of
wealth-building after the Covid pandemic.
Without
question, the gap between rich and poor around the globe is a death struggle
for some against famine, security, and climate.
Too
many in the emerging nations still suffer from empty coffers and barren water
wells. The process of providing for the
common good is sometimes synthesized by politicians into a struggle to maintain
power at all costs. The nature of
politics has transformed from noble altruism into moral degradation.
Markets
As
with anything in the capital markets, the issues usually are defined by
profitability and costs. The other line
items of corporate accounting rely upon conscience, vision, motivation, and
leadership. For example, most agricultural
businesses know the science of splicing genes, warding off insect diseases,
managing water flows, and the like.
Advances in genomics allow these companies to hone in on desired traits
and characteristics that yield the highest crop potentials…saving time, and resources,
in the process. These are benchmark
achievements of our generation.
The
problem is that the motivation to share these resources with a broad swath of
the public requires money that the monopolies don’t seem eager to spend. Inspired by this new post-pandemic
capitalism, companies keep themselves ready for the next catastrophe by
hoarding cash and building profits until the next lag in earnings hits. In the meantime, spiking food prices, scarcities,
and uncivil discourse have relegated the less fortunate into perpetual
desperation. The staples of a good life,
including housing, education, healthcare, and food are taken for granted by
those who have them, coveted by those without.
A recent spate of global labor strikes bears witness to the dichotomy
between the haves and have-nots.
The
pandemic also laid bare the plight of global supply chains by disrupting
distribution channels. In a world where
billions of people rely upon the seas, the air, and land transportation for the
basics of life, more people are going hungry and without those things than ever
before. Science and politics might have
the “answers” to all of life’s hardships, but even the experts must sit by idly
while institutions diddle around trying to diagnose the issues, offering up excuses
and rhetoric to appease their jingoistic base.
We
know, for example, that climate change has become a defining factor now
influencing many of these social issues.
In a warming world, the risk of dislocation, poverty, and famine has
unfortunately become a new normal. While
rising temperatures might actually raise crop output in some regions, the
demand for water and fertile land is also increasing as the population
soars. Scientists tell us that as
temperatures rise the net crop retrieval rate per square acre of farmland will
drop because of insufficient water capabilities. In drier areas of the globe where water for
irrigation is more scarce, farming as a way of life is perishing. Hurricane ravaged regions might say they are
inundated by water; drought stricken areas say just the opposite.
What
Wall Street needs to heed, both anecdotally and analytically, is that conventional
ways of doing business will not suffice in this ever changing pattern. However, the corporate sector and politics
are decades behind in addressing the needs of our time. As we reevaluate the
landscape in a post pandemic world we are discovering that more of our fellow
citizens are malnourished, both in body and spirit. “Deep pockets” is not an excuse for moral
vapidness. “Not my problem” is, in fact, your problem.
Strategy
Wall
Street should be warming to the concept of using innovation and technology to
“do good” as well as creating long-term profitability. It is possible to expand the value of your
401-k while investing responsibly, consistent with a values-based
standard. A company that feeds the poor
utilizing better science, or which increases clean energy production, or which
builds affordable housing, or which delivers education and technology to rural
populations can also have a rising share price.
Whether or not you, too, would own one of these companies that abides by
a sustainable mission also speaks volumes about your investment methodologies,
objectives, and empathy.
Good
stewardship of our planet, fair governance and compliance, and
profitability from innovation and strong demand are themes that will resonate with a higher
percentage of the public these days. Not
everything is a zero-sum game. “I win,
you lose” is, itself, a counterproductive financial objective. Generating earnings does not, by definition,
have to come with a prohibitive cost. In
fact, I would argue that not to
do these things impedes social progress….and might cost your portfolio
bottom-line extraordinary gains from a lack of exposure to new science.
Lest
the reader thinks that we are espousing a “Pollyanna” view of the world, let
him be reminded that roads are agnostic, schools are agnostic; hospitals are
agnostic; food is agnostic; energy is agnostic.
The point is that no special interest or specific trend is exclusive to
one group. Walk a mile in someone else’s
shoes and you’ll understand the lyric from (with apologies to my much younger
contemporaries) Joni Mitchell….”you don’t know what you’ve got ‘til it’s
gone…” As quantitative analysts we refer to
quotients whose comprehensive scores result in the highest probabilities of
capital gains for our client’s accounts, and which lead to continuous,
intergenerational wealth building and earnings creation. Our fourth quarter research leads us to
conclude that a substantial portion of this market’s “run” is completed and
that investors are starting to reign in their enthusiasm. Further, there is a perceptible shift towards
natural resources, tangible assets, and defensive sectors. Although we are about to enter the holiday
buying season, it appears as if higher interest rates, supply chain impasses,
and waning confidence could negatively impact the retail sector in their
efforts to build year-end earnings acceleration.
Therefore,
one must always take into account the imprecise nature of exogenous events and political
discourse that advances a divisive narrative.
As mentioned in the first paragraph, all sorts of dissonant factors have
changed the playing field inexorably…or so it seems. Government inertia, lack of willpower, and consumer
uncertainty about the sustainability of the global recovery have thrown
obstacles into this year’s push toward ubiquitous resurgence. And it’s not a certainty that that hangover
of apathy won’t linger for several more months.
The magnitude of disruption caused by Covid has had both a psychological
and financial effect upon the duration and magnitude of the recovery.
Conclusion
Our
strategy is to manage aggressively against disruption and to diversify into a
more moderate framework for the balance of the year. We have always warned against “linear spikes”
that developed during the rebound, and unfortunately those spikes, and their
capitulations, have occurred. We have no
reason to doubt that additional surprises won’t happen.
If
yields continue to rise we would expect a concomitant decrease in earnings
acceleration rates in equities.
Interestingly, though, a rise in rates sets up a more durable
alternative investment scenario for the average investor looking to diversify
into short term instruments for protection against stock volatility. But be forewarned: volatility is a part of
investing and cannot be ignored.
These
various headwinds discussed herein, and others, pose larger questions for
investors as they prepare to close out a very turbulent year. Traditional “large market” opportunity has
been supplanted by venture capital and emerging technologies. Tighter money has put limitations on
unnecessary and exorbitant borrowing. It
is time to acknowledge that yield-based and defensive sector investing offers
consistency and protection from volatility and portfolio drawdown.
As
we undertake a comprehensive effort to restructure and rebalance portfolio risk
we must remind our readers that quantitative, integers-based modeling with a
strong bias towards earnings acceleration pattens has historically proven for
us to be our way of mitigating against the vagaries of style, emotion, and
conjecture. Our work over the years in
“silo specific” portfolio creation has built an amalgam of successes irrespective
of capitalization valuation all related to creating capital appreciation in
areas that provide investment stability……..notably, healthcare,
technology, basic materials, infrastructure, education, energy, and agriculture. We have demonstrated over the decades
that it is possible to allocate a reasonable portion of monies into socially
responsible themes while still creating financial gain without sacrificing
methodology or performance.
Suggested
balanced account asset allocation, Q4, 2023
Equity: 53%
Fixed
Income: 39%
Cash: 8%