Monday, September 24, 2018

Market Commentary for the week of September 24, 2018

Rich or poor?
It is becoming inevitable that both interest rates and rates of inflation will be on the rise during the coming months.  Why would this matter?
To begin, most investors not only care about how much money they have, but also about how much they are worth.  On a relative basis, higher interest rates and greater inflation erode the imagery of one's cash.  The "fair value" of our net worth is oftentimes equal to the net worth value minus any debt or outside disorderly factors.  When the destructive values are increasing, the purchasing power of your money is diminishing.
The cost of milk, tuition, travel, home-buying, etc., creates a cacophony of "noise" that disrupts your ability to get and stay ahead.
The timing of the rate hikes really couldn't be more ill-timed.  Just as the economic recovery is taking root (following the calamity of the last Great Recession 2008) a daunting assessment is being thrust upon the backs of the investment population.  Given enough time to digest the rate hikes, the financial markets have thus far responded relatively benevolently.  But consider that as stock companies will eventually have to "pay more" to borrow money, it probably will eviscerate their heretofore maximum profits; municipalities will have to dig a little deeper to meet their debt obligations; and the average investor will have to shell out more cash to buy a car, television, or college education.
Considering the time, cost, and opportunity of pursuing higher returns with greater portfolio security, there seldom is a single panacea to complex investment problems.  The conundrum is that very long term cyclical phenomena are too often employed to try and explain short-term performance expectations.  For example, as interest rates start to rise the potential over time to buttress portfolio performance with a finite baseline rate of return (that's the long-term part of the equation) will be thwarted by the impact of "expensive money" upon current portfolio valuations (the short-term, knee-jerk response).  Consistently beating the fantasy averages is a fleeting and elusive objective.  The goal,  I believe, should be to evaluate your unique situation, define your expectations for your money, and establish the proper risk protocols to enable successful portfolio results during periods in which circumstances might be in flux.
It is a more valuable use of your time and energy to focus attention upon the processes  of your investment methodology rather than upon the outcome of the methodology, itself.
Patience
Throughout the many gyrations of the financial markets' journeys, the challenge is not only to quantify the integers which represent those changes, but also the impact of those changes upon the human condition.  While we might be able to calculate the numerical level of inflation, for example, how do we measure the financial "cost" of those data upon people's lives?
Divesting oneself of the performance expectations game  is not easy to do.  Portfolio results oscillate depending upon the circumstances of the overall market and economy.  Remaining calm in the face of imminent change is an acquired skill set.  We also know that things are always perceived as most severe immediately upon inception, while those factor's impact usually dissipates over time....good or bad.
Are you rich or poor?  It depends whether you use empirical number-crunching to answer that query, or whether a values-based judgment is a better way of prioritizing what's important. 

Monday, September 17, 2018

Market Commentary for the week of September 17, 2018


Mind games
The basic premise of successful money management  differs somewhat from the conventional definition of simply investing  on Wall Street.  This subtle delineation is the cause of so much investor consternation when things somehow stop going their way.  The former is the execution of risk strategies that protect investors from the vagaries of time, while the latter is nothing more than a roulette wheel approach to generating capital gains.
Why is the distinction, subtle as it is, so important to talk about?  Because without a methodology and a specific plan for avoiding failure, it is difficult if not impossible to quantify the opportunity you seek.
Shall we agree that investing is a daunting undertaking regardless?  At best it is an exercise in the expression of hope we all harbor about making good things happen with our money.
But it is also critical to assess how that investment landscape performs over time, in what sequence, and in what degree of duration.  Stocks are sometimes "trickier" than bonds; bonds somewhat more effective than cash; and the blend of all of these asset classes, including complex delineations within those categories, determines the probability of a successful investment outcome over a specific period of time.
Thus, those who solely focus upon tech stock gains, or municipal bond-only  portfolio return, or who bury their cash in a tin can in the back yard  are only playing with a few cards in the deck of a myriad number of other options available to them.
It's not unusual to be swayed by the sales presentation of a "shiny" new idea, but the ultimate game-player knows where and when to locate those "special situations" opportunities, how to put in the hours of research, calibrates the odds and plans for unknown circumstances which might knock him off course, just in case.
The compromise, therefore, is to turn off the 24 hour cable business news; factor in your own personal dynamic; develop a macro top-down attitude about the world in which we live; and seek solutions to problems with which we identify that also have capital gains potential for the long term.  Even still, there are no assurances of a positive outcome.  Exceptional investment results are not only just integers on a page, but our perceptions  about those expectations we bring to the undertaking.
A frenzy of one-off, risky non-strategic behaviors is the surest way to ensure investment failure.
Guard the jewels
Should you care about these methodological distinctions I'm writing about?  "What is my annual return?",  you might respond.  Well, when things are going well in your portfolio, the answer is quite simple: the number is the number.
But what about times of unique performance perversion? 1978, 1986, 1993, 1999, 2001, 2008.  Each of those years represents a severe regression  in the optimism of bull-only investors and the performance of financial assets.  Do you recall how hard it was to recover from losses of over 25%.  Or 30%.  What about the tech (dot.com) wreck of over 90%?
Every era has a difficult regressive phase.  That is the nature of cyclical investing.  If you were one of the investors who got punished in the past for failure to plan, then you might still be licking your wounds today, if you weren't' fortunate enough to have had the patience to recover after a decade or more.
Methodology and discipline are the antidotes to the "shiny new coin" approach to chasing a dream.