Full
plate
A decade of capital
gains should be good enough for most anybody, shouldn't it? As the global economy starts to shift into
higher gears, the Great Recession is becoming a distant memory. The message coming out of the global economic
summit in Davos, Switzerland last week was cautiously optimistic. So, will the good times keep rolling
forward? It all depends on how your
aperture of expectations is calibrated.
The contrast, however,
between Wall Street and Main Street is striking. While one (the former) moves effortlessly
like a jaguar, the other (the latter) moves at a snail's pace. The political "populism movement"
has evolved out of this dichotomy, and is alchemically rejuvenated with each
quarter of growing corporate profitability.
Despairingly for some, the recent good fortune of corporate commerce has
become a sore spot, where they look up at the fortunate and ask, "where's my piece of the pie?".
By recent historical
standards, the gap between the affluent and the poor has become excessively
discomfiting. Depending upon which side
of the paradigm you lie, things are either alright or downright unfair.
Even if you feel as if
you're on the wrong end of the scale, empirical evidence suggests, however,
that the tides are rising for all ships in the harbor. The level of economic expansion supports
current equity price increases, no doubt.
The question, as I've suggested in the past, is whether the rate of appreciation in stock
market valuation is sustainable and/or realistic.
The global economy is
now creating more jobs, profits are rising, and US output (GDP) has risen above
3% for the first time since the early part of this millennium. We expect a continuation for each of these
factors for the foreseeable future.
But I caution, once
again, that the stock markets and the economy are only linked congruently
(parallel disconnect) in a partnership that is highly fragmented by sectors of
varying performance. Technology and
Cyclicals have done exceedingly well, but as stock prices rise in these
successful areas it is likely that a more defensive allocation shift might
occur. Money is always in fluid
transition from one prosperous sector to another. While I am not forecasting a cessation of the
bull, nor an economic recession, the potential for higher inflation and
interest rates is definitely a factor in our future projections. Those, by themselves, will not erode an
economic expansion, but they do signal the potential for seismic shifts in
economic advances and the areas (both by sector and geography) in which they
might reside.
Nevertheless, despite
my confidence in the bull market overall, I will safely assert that the current rate of stock price accretion
will not continue indefinitely and might abate significantly, if these
benevolent circumstances don't permeate down to the "average"
consumer.
In other words,
everything must continue to improve, beyond today's levels, with or without
Federal intervention, or we are in jeopardy of changing our economic and market
forecasts.
As it appears now,
consumer purchasing power has not proven to be sufficient to keep the expansion
going. Somewhere, somehow, this year
(2018) will be critical in finding the source of "fuel" to power the economy's
engine.
Pay
attention
Growth is a factor of
two things: demand and production. Both
elements must be increasing if the market and the economy are to power
forward. To be sure, we have seen
productivity increases for the last half-decade at least. Thanks to technology, accounting, and prudent
fiduciary stewardship, corporations have wrung about as much as they can from
their part of the equation. Now it's
time to incentivize the buyer. I have
always believed in a "better mousetrap" theory of economics. Secular social issues are the nexus for the
"next big things", for example, in areas such as water and food
development, biotech and medical research, alternative energy, and physical
plant (infrastructure).
It is entirely possible
that the markets are "different this time".....but I doubt
it. On a scale of probabilities ranging
from zero to one hundred, there might be infinite scale, but only a limited
number of possibilities. How we address
the issues of economic and social equanimity, as well as the moral peril
inherent in that discussion, will determine the opportunity investors have for
cashing in on the next bonanza and keeping the party going for years ahead.
No comments:
Post a Comment