The third quarter is winding down and, thankfully, the economy, along with the financial markets, appear to have gotten through the "doldrums period" that is usually associated with the summer season relatively unscathed. You've heard the old adage, "sell in May and go away". That appears to be the case this year. Left uninterrupted, fundamentals are in place to project out to a modest cyclical expansion for the next few quarters, at least. We are not adjusting our projections for a gradual and steady pace of wealth creation in the markets.
One
only need look at the recovery in portfolio valuations during the last 8 years
to realize that there is no incentive to take the market back to a dangerous
precipice and risk, once again, any hard-won gains. Indeed, home prices, stocks, and savings are
heftier today; portfolios are larger; and our collective psyche is somewhat
less apprehensive.
Surveys
and transactions also find that the wealthiest amongst us are more willing to
take risks and speculate in financial assets.
As the population's net worth expands, so too does the level of
investment banking, capital market asset formation, and global research and
development.
The
result is an amplification in relative strength integers framed by a more
enduring, less cyclical, pulse. While
this intensification, by itself, might sometimes be a unique danger sign, we
are noticeably finding a broadening of potential in sectors which heretofore
have lain dormant or been lagging "traditional" leadership categories. In
other words, breadth is widening even though the pace
might be modulating.
As
stated, relative strength amplitudes (time duration from trough-to-trough)
might be contracting, but stock profit potential is accelerating based upon the
creation of new wealth during the past half-decade as well as improving
economic data.
No
worries?
Is
there anything, then, which might derail the market's forward progress? Of course there is...there always is. That is the nature of economics, cycle phase
investing, and market speculation.
Many
point to a widening net-worth and wage gap in the population. Whereas certain gains might be obvious and
pervasive, younger first-time job seekers are having a hard time finding
employment in their chosen fields of endeavor.
For this segment of the workforce, as well as another majority living
less- well than the affluent, home buying is simply out of the question. Other "opportunity impediments" include the fact that food and transportation are
getting more expensive, healthcare costs are becoming prohibitive, and there
are fewer, if any, discretionary funds with which to dabble in the stock
markets.
For
these less fortunate citizens, their confidence quotients are measured on a
month-to-month or day-to-day scale. How
well they survive the next 24 hours is the barometer of their expectations. Dividend
yields, P/E ratios, and earnings forecasts are terms they only read about but do not
experience firsthand. For them, they
feel heightened risk based upon a multiplicity of factors that the wealthy
don't even pay attention to.
We
need to admonish our representatives not to abandon the disenfranchised, at the
risk of risk permanently damaging their upside pursuit and potential. This might include central banks allowing
interest rates to "float" to a competitive equilibrium, no corporate
hoarding of cash, and CEO's who guide their businesses everyday to try to develop
game plans which build innovation and ingenuity into the economic (and
social) landscape.
No comments:
Post a Comment