Day after day the market spirals upwards, then downwards, by hundred of points, seemingly incapable of making up its mind as to which trend to pay allegiance. Last week, for example, it wasn't unusual for the naysayers to point to potential interest rate increases as justification for the end of the bull market rally. Then, within hours, the equity averages surged because wages and jobs data showed continuing improvement.
By
the way, could a default in Greece affect milk prices in Nebraska...?
Such
is the craziness of intraday global market analysis.
All
of these anxiety producers have caused me to shake my head and ask whether
anybody still subscribes to a discipline in which more permanent, secular information defines one's perspective?
While
big price moves are to be expected in "risk markets", they are
becoming more pervasive, I believe, because technology....or, more
specifically, a focus upon technology.....impedes
the observer from looking at the world in a "big picture" way rather
than nanosecond to nanosecond, and almost forces us to respond to a multiplicity of minutiae
and exogenous events, quid pro quo.
I
also see these volatility episodes scaring away average investors who, I
believe, would love to come back to participating in the markets, with an
altruistic meaning of equity ownership, in order to build net-worth and
security for their future.
Thus,
volatility causes volatility. Certainly,
we cannot eliminate risk and fluctuation from "gambling endeavors"
(investing). But neither can we afford
to alienate the consumers that we seek who are vital to keeping the game (money
flow) in balance.
In
a way, uncertainty and volatility feed off themselves, becoming self-fulfilling
prophecies. Perhaps our obsession with
economic weakness and statistical permutation actually cause corporate and
municipal capital expenditures from occurring (?)
Ground
up
The
past few years have been a slow recovery from the abyss of financial
near-collapse. I think it is unlikely
that we will return to another great recession-type era in the near
future. Too much effort has been put
into the rebuilding process. But we also
know that there is an undercurrent of mistrust and aftershocks that are causing
the market to gyrate in fits and starts.
We
need to start looking at the macro, big picture to derive suggestions about how
to move capital effectively and efficiently.
Rather
than waiting for a "hero" sector to emerge, we should play a
proactive role in reading the tea leaves about certain conditions that buttress
all global economics. If, in fact, the
recovery is happening, we need to be aware of pricing power, supply chains, and
the demand curve. I have written
extensively, and shall continue to do so, about concurrent vectors in
agriculture, potable water, and commodities prices. Top-down macro trends are pointing to a
diminution in arable farmland across the globe.
A sophisticated economic infrastructure cannot rely solely upon
capricious weather patterns to support its population's food needs.
For
now, in my role as portfolio manager, I would suggest investors focus not so
much on the daily business news television channels as on their civic responsibilities
and their moral compass.
Good
health, good schools, good food, good communities, good infrastructure, good
science.....
....good
Earth.
No comments:
Post a Comment