A bit of nerves struck the market like a lightning bolt last week in response to a reprise of a potential credit and banking crisis in Europe and obviously extended domestic (US) equity valuations. Yet, while the fundamentals are in place for continued modest expansion in cyclical economic growth, one still has to ask why we feel so ambiguous about our personal prospects for participating in what the "experts" tell us is a renaissance in financial opportunity? It seems to me that the most important piece of data we need to consider when evaluating sustainable activity in the market/economy is whether or not citizens feel connected (or not) to the consequences of this cyclical resurgence. There is no classic definition of what it means to be rich or poor, it's more a matter of our perspective about our place in the world. Unfortunately, owing to human nature, whether you’re rich or poor, there is always someone who appears better off financially against whom we might compare ourselves. For that reason, and others, more than a few of you feel perfectly comfortable leaving the Wall Street casino to the speculators and well-heeled traders.
Believe
me, there are no personal windfalls emanating out of this market upswing.
Instead,
prices for goods and services are rising....yet no serious inflation is
indicated by "the data". Household
savings are down; wages are
stagnant, relative to the increase in jobs' numbers; and despite an uptick in business capital
expenditures, their (business) sole hope is for demand dramatically to increase
to support their spending in new equipment, inventories and personnel.
Thus
far, the equity markets are doing it with smoke and mirrors, engaging every
nuance to make earnings look like top
line revenue growth. However, most
earnings expansion is actually coming from a refusal to spend money, and
an accounting system that impacts positively upon expenses, taxes, and
amortization.
The
sole engine to equity price expansion, according to my metrics, is an
insistently low level of interest rates and a lack of alternative investment
options. If interest rates ever do go up, as the Fed
indicated last week they will, the headwind against which the markets will
travel could be significant. This time
around, I would caution against being seduced by a seemingly self-sustaining,
linear bull recovery that, ultimately, will abate.
Still
gambling
The
markets are only one barometer of economic prosperity. It certainly is nice to see portfolio
valuations rising. The lure of chasing
after even higher growth possibilities, more aggressive "indexing",
is a difficult siren call to try and ignore.
The fact that one's 401-k and retirement plans have gone up in value is
good for you, your children, your portfolio manager, and Wall Street. But it doesn't remediate the problems which
still plague the economy, worldwide, in general.
The
bottom line: consumers need help in catching up financially, emotionally, and
spiritually to a runaway train that looks like it has left them behind. There exists a powerful disconnect between
the hallowed halls of finance and the kitchen table dialogue of most average consumers.
Fewer
people of their generation are working at jobs that befit their credentials (education,
experience, objectives, etc.) than at any time in the past 40 years. Wages, as a result, are lower
comparatively. Everyday costs are
rising, pushing more young people to the brink of "subsistence"
rather than "affluence". Food
is expensive, discretionary spending is non-existent.
Friends
I know refute my analysis as "doom-and-gloom",
citing more millionaires, more corporate
capital expansion, more mergers and acquisitions, higher portfolio valuations,
more home sales. They are indeed correct
with their observations. The data of the
past 5 years shows a remarkable expansion in economic activity.
But
the span and scope of their analysis is
shortsighted. The past five years only represents a rebound
from this generation's worst financial
recession, and one of the worst global regressions (in peace, prosperity, business
ethics, and economic development) in memory. Gross returns may be up, but net
profitability is being beaten to a pulp.
Dow
17,000 is not just a number or another benchmark. It is a representation of a major sea-change
in economic theory whereby the integers get larger at the same time as the
public's confidence and opportunity diverges wider from the events on the
ground.
No comments:
Post a Comment