For many months I have been commenting that the critical element most lacking from our rebound in economic development has been “consumer confidence.” Wouldn’t it be nice if we could not only quantify confidence but also to define it, accurately? After all, something so nebulous as one’s opinion about something, also has the power to shape behavior and consequences for a myriad of financial and economic events.
Besides, one man’s opinion
might not be shared by a multiplicity of others.
We hear and read everyday
about how excited the markets and its participants become over a series of news
data. This is unfortunate, as the
panoply of behaviors and activities this “excitement” generates causes peaks
and valleys in our emotional responses.
As a result we might be emboldened one day, downright depressed the
next.
The era of buy and hold
investing has been supplanted by a technology-driven short-term orientation
whose effect has been either to shake “confidence” or to bolster it.
In fact, not only are these
demarcations driven by daily news, but they are also shaped by one’s financial
status before the events unfold.
In other words, if you’re well-off financially some things might not
bother, or influence, your perception the same way as if you’re living paycheck
to paycheck. Middle-to-low income
consumers are being/feeling squeezed by “fiscal cliff” stuff, so much so that
their confidence is nearly exhausted.
At the same time, Washington ’s dalliances
are simply a minor nuisance for the well-to-do.
Overall, consumers either zip
up their wallets, or open them, based upon the financial pressures they feel,
individually and collectively. Right
now, a significant majority of us are grateful for small recoveries, but still
not feeling exuberant as the global economy trudges out of its depths.
Success or failure.
Still, maintaining the
discipline to forge ahead without the brief staccato of everyday
interruptions takes a hearty constitution.
We must continue to monitor our goals, and our methodology, diligently
and not allow our horizons to be affected by exogenous noise.
It is always fun to see our
valuations increase. One’s mood rises or
falls sometimes, based upon the value of our monthly brokerage statement. But the reality is that all cycles are evolutionary.
They do not traverse a straight line but
do, over time, define a trendline which is either rising or falling. It is toxic to be on a falling trend; but it
is equally dangerous to allow our mood to be affected by short-cycle variances.
Last week the market logically
began to tread water. As I wrote prior,
it would be unrealistic to expect an unimpeded upside. We will continue to vacillate, up and down,
and no fear should be engendered by that fact.
Which comes first, confidence
or momentum? Ask a golfer and he might
tell you momentum, you know, five birdies in a row. It’s a tricky tightrope we walk as
investors. But there’s no question that
building confidence, and gaining momentum, are inextricably linked through a
kaleidoscope of factors.
At present, we’re looking
ahead at building a fair measure of small, incremental successes to erase any
uncertainly about the sustainability of our recovery.
No comments:
Post a Comment