Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Market Commentary for the week of March 22, 2011

Fair and balanced?

What’s an investor to do?  Climatological and economic tsunamis dominated the news last week, dulling the senses, if not heightening the apprehensions, to fundamentals, facts and long term perspective.  Everything has become micro analysis on a less-than 24 hour cycle.  Sometimes the perception doesn’t quite match with the real story.

As an analyst, and money manager, I must put the focus back on methodology, science and substance for my clients, elevating the dialogue to a higher plane than simply rumor or inference.

The starting point is the facts.  Inflation is rising due to cost push in commodities; valuations are likely to descend as a result of severe magnitudinal increases since 2009; neither equities nor bonds represent “safe-haven” from elongated cycles; and politics dominates the fiscal discussion turning nuance into black or white, opinion into Democratic or Republican.  Globally, the same political debate centers around austerity or socialism as the polar choices.

When the volume gets turned up, as it does in our instant communication world, the sheer magnitude of expectations cascades negatively or positively within seconds, devoid of any perspective or long-term strategy.  Clients need more balance and science in their analysis and thinking.

Risk.

No one disputes the necessity to trade the markets or to engineer boardroom-level merger and acquisition conversations.  These activities are the foundation of the capital markets, securing the efficient and profitable exchange of money, and delivering useful coefficients of productivity.

But there has been an unusual amount of focus upon deal-making almost to the exclusion of efficiency, simply to give the impression that someone’s awake at the helm and using capital at low cost to acquire “stuff.”

To that end, clients do suffer, finding their equities violently fluctuating based not upon long term fundamentals, but short news cycles and speculation.  Such activity numbs the average investor into submission causing them to throw up their hands saying “What can you do?”

I sense, when talking to investors, that they now feel there is no good news, particularly if it affects their investment future.

Both the markets and the media need to do a better job retreating from the “fast money” concepts and to return to a sense of long-term, strategic methodological science.  I am happy to try to do my part in that area.

Insight.

So what’s an investor to do?  Do you stop investing altogether?  Absolutely not.  Markets are cyclical and show a tremendous resiliency in the long term to represent the trend accurately.  The key is the trend.  In a bear, be defensive.  In a bull, take the offense.  The same is true with sector rotation, avoid the Cyclicals.  In a poor economy, buy the defensive sectors.

Use the value of quantitative solutions to calibrate and codify basic trends and the probability of maintaining their magnitude.  Avoid, or sell, losers.  Be patient acknowledging that asset allocation might have more of an effect upon the likelihood of your portfolio making money, than the potential ill-effects of one-size-fits-all, or one stock, being your “home run.”

If enough is enough, trust your instinct.  But rely on science, not hunch, to deliver the goods.

No comments: