Monday, September 27, 2010

Market Commentary for the week of September 27, 2010

Inertia.

One of the most hotly contested debates within the financial markets is whether data “supports or refutes” current actions of stock and bond performance.  One of my colleagues strongly suggests that the disconnect between equity direction and news releases is nearly correlated.  While I agree that there is a high inverse correlation between daily stock prices and long-term fundamentals, I am not yet willing to throw in the towel about equity ownership.

In fact, with bond yields as low as they are, there is seemingly no other choice but stocks with which to ride out this storm.

In addition, there are significantly more options to own than just classical “blue chips.”  Uptrend cycles in agriculture, basic materials, utilities and technology are forming in my long-term analytics, even though the short-term is sympathetically volatile with current statistics.  In other words, depending upon one’s aperture or perspective, the long term prospects for industrial development, technological innovation, and infrastructure looks much rosier than what knee-jerk traders would have you believe.

I hasten to caution that short-term cycles, whose performance since July has been impressive, are near expiration and likely to turn down in the near term.

As always, these issues translate into one’s time horizon and tolerance for risk.  Versus the broader global averages, it is quite possible to isolate situations and sectors whose upside probabilities are more optimistic.  The only hurdle to this exercise is to remain confident in one’s discipline and not to get dissuaded by “exogenous noise.”  Usually, the more obstacles placed in your way, the more difficult it is to find good investments, but the more likely it might be to reap positive rewards.  My philosophy of prudent asset and sector allocation has been important to my clients during this navigation.

Forecast.

When comparing groups to the rest of the market, I prefer to look for earnings acceleration patterns and relative strength indices whose values give me a higher probability of outperformance against a general benchmark.  I am noticing a gradual shift (despite non-confirmation from public data) into tangible assets, inflation plays, and yield oriented securities in my RSI components, and a decidedly anti-consumer bias in those rankings.

Although the past two months have been heroic, the achievements are less-than substantial.  The most we have gotten from those indices is “new annual highs,” while valuations remain at least 15-30% below previous all-time highs, a mighty struggle to maintain relevance, at best.

The next short cycle direction is likely to be down and likely to break all the support bases built during the summer.  Signs are building that my colleague might get what he wishes for, a full-bore, year-end confluence of negative global economic statistics along with a market bear.

Overall, investors are looking for confirmation of the direction of their choice, higher or lower.  It is, in fact, this uncertainty about such confirmation that keeps any rallies from emerging strongly, and holds at bay any commitment to deploy cash into financial securities.

No comments: