Monday, January 24, 2011

Market Commentary for the week of January 24, 2011

At the limit.

Here, at their apex for the last eight months, global markets are trying desperately to find the next super-upleg from amongst a vast array of economic data, market fundamentals, and existing capital gains winners.  The solutions are not as obvious as simply riding the current uptrends.  Many of those, for example, are losing momentum and sustainability.  As I review the current landscape of short-cycle measurements, I am more worried about the potential for distribution and dissolution at the top than about sustainability or magnitude.  Very few trends are in their “initiation phase,” those most likely to achieve upside magnitude.

The conditions have changed drastically since the inception of last year’s summer rally.  Primary amongst those changes are that the rallies are no longer expected, they have already occurred.  Add to this the markets are climbing a wall of worry, led firstly by consumer skepticism about entering the market at all, let alone at the top of a rally.

Most significantly, though, is that these short cycle upswings are taking place within a broader secular bear that is now 5 years old.

Therefore, unlike bull markets during which a buy and hold strategy is appropriate, cyclical upswings within bear markets require greater alacrity and more trading.

Key drivers.

What we can observe through historical precedent, however, is that bold demographic themes typically lead the markets out of recessions.  I believe that one of those innovative explosions will come from agriculture and food related products.

The strain on the global food network is both man-made and natural.  War related strife produces hoarding or famine, and natural disasters create harvest imbalances, all of which resonate far beyond the scope of the local geography in which they occur.  As citizens we should be horrified that anyone on this planet goes to bed hungry.  As investors we might be able to capitalize upon solutions to these problems.  (Of course, therein lies the bane of social investing.  We might observe the demographic, but we are sometimes morally or remuneratively deficient in solving the issues of our day.)

Caution.

There is a lot of talk about the direction of interest rates and the cost of money.  Sometimes, exogenous influences also exert influence over monetary factors.  Today, tightening supplies of natural resources have created a subterranean inflation whose gross result has been to raise prices at the production and consumption sites.  Corn, sugar, coffee, soybeans and other crops are at their lowest reserve levels in a generation.  Demand, however, has not ebbed.

There is no wiggle room.  If global conditions worsen prices might rise further.  Consumption of natural resources is at its highest in history.  For all the development of industrialized and emerging markets, there is a price to pay if replenishment is not part of the program.

As policy debates about subsidies and taxation gain momentum, it is likely that prices will be adversely affected, raising further the spectre of inflation.

It is likely that eco-friendly technology and agribusiness innovation could become the dot.com sector of another time.  Health, social responsibility, and well-being are not mutually exclusive.  In fact they might be the catch phrase for those who, at present, cannot turn off their cell phones and BlackBerry’s long enough to look up and see the world they have left in their wake.

No comments: